Thank you for this, exactly what I wanted to read (I’ve been leaning towards the cx for months but keep talking myself out of it). [–]Mailesan_R 2 points3 points4 points 8 months ago (4 children). It also has much better gray uniformity and has a wider color gamut with more accurate colors out-of-the-box. I just eyeball it with whatever settings I like. I’d say it’s a 10/10 compared to anything in its class. Atleast we get the Q95 model in India. I don't know the exact workings... but its not like you have a finite hour count that can be easily reached. I'm always pleasantly surprised by how bright the screen is. [–]AlexTheRockstarSamsung Shill 0 points1 point2 points 8 months ago (0 children), [–]jordanpinheiro 0 points1 point2 points 8 months ago (1 child), Honestly in your case, I might consider the CX, especially if your tv will be in a dark room with no or very few windows. I was somewhat worried about brightness levels when I got my CX but I was pleasantly surprised at how bright it gets. The 90T has VRR, but only between 48-60 Hz. [–]eaglelion123 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children). My usage pattern follows yours it seems, though I primarily bought the set because of the wonderful support for Xbox Series X. I have it mounted above my sit/stand desk and use it as a monitor too. [–]babunal 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (9 children). They can be removed at our discretion for any reason including but not limited to Off Topic posting (including Soundbars) & Misinformation. So I called the actually 1800 number and confirmed it. Please check rtings.com years long burn in test if you need evidence. HOWEVER, I can tell you that I am a picture quality freak and have yet to notice any discrepancies with the CX. OLED will look better in a completely dark room. Most extended warranties consider burn-in as a result of normal wear and tear. It is not as bright as what I’m used to with the Samsung so I think this will be my biggest adjustment, but from what I’ve read the picture of the OLED is a more natural and true picture. Just conscious that there are a few “cyberpunk” games like watchdogs legion and 2077 coming out soon where vivid neon lights are going to be a big part of the atmosphere. Nothing beats the blacks and uniformity of the OLED. The Q90T is only slightly better than the Q80T but much more expensive. Again, I will say the potential for stunning picture quality on the CX is something I feel comfortable recommending. The 80T has very good blacks for being LED. No META [Suggestions] Posts, please message the moderators through Modmail Instead. I’ve got both last years q85t and c8 oled so I feel qualified to answer here. The 80T is in my living room well lit, and CX in my gaming room. I just bought a CX, but i think is not too bright for my tastes....so i was deciding to change it with a Q90T.... which are your settings to get a good brightness? What model is it? Overall, having seen both in person, in my own living room. I agree with the image not looking good. And does it diminish the impact of bright scenes? Samsung Q90T vs LG CX 65’ ... Reddit is crazy, Rtings too. It's beyond annoying. Upscaling is a very very hard thing to pin down before hand as you're dealing with the processor and it's a bit more of an abstract aspect of the TV. Buying Advice USSamsung Q90T vs LG CX 65’ (self.4kTV). Enjoy the new CX. That’s crazy, [–]UnholybuffaloLG CX 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (0 children). Just trust me and go with an OLED TV like the CX. Unfortunate news everyone. I just got my OLED and I was just about to write a post about it. My conclusion: I would never buy an OLED because I’m a worrier and I don’t want to spend $2500 on a tv that might get burn-in in a year or so with heavy gaming or forgetting to turn the tv off when something is paused. What's your room setting like? I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. TV sound is decent with bass, most of the time I keep my Yamaha YSP5600 switch off. SO, go out and buy that CX, get the extended plan, burn-in some 24 hour news by turning off the safety features and leaving it on for about a week or two towards the end of the plan, and enjoy your free TV upgrade (which you can buy a new plan on to repeat the process in another 5 years). Buying Advice US. 10. GX65: sort of ghosting/brightness lag on some very bright content. While it’s absolutely true you’ll get the best picture from the OLED, the downside of OLED is potential burn-in. LG CX 65" or 77" - is the price difference worth it? The issue with bright scenes (especially in HDR (High Dynamic Range) content) is that there is a risk on OLED that the screen will overheat if it is outputting too much light, so the manufacturer limits the peak brightness of each individual pixel as the scene gets brighter and brighter. [–]Forced__Perspective 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children). Not as bright but if you play in the dark the blacks and contrast will look much nicer than Samsung, also I have a C9 and never blast brightness cause I find it too bright during evening or night. LG CX > BX > Q90T > Q80T > XH900. No issues with anything in 720 or 1080 though. [–]ConanTheBarbituate 1 point2 points3 points 8 months ago (8 children). Many questions have already been answered, USE SEARCH & See FAQ's. [–]Flaunt7 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (0 children), to add to this discussion, CX is the only display which has true 4k 4:4:4 120hz HDR with no chroma sub sampling. [–]Mailesan_R 0 points1 point2 points 8 months ago (0 children). The Q90T wins in burn in risk, total brightness, and a true HDR. At such a small difference in price, the CX would be my choice- … I mean. I worked out a deal with a family member where I gave them my Q90R on the cheap and then bought a LG CX. Even without burn, the thought that the pixels are very slowly degrading gives me anxiety (don't worry, it's not a practical issue. Hope no one attacks me for being this way. However, when they shoot scenes in the true dark(like when they show inside the Empire ship) the blacks are REALLY black. When requesting help for issues POST DETAILS, MODELS, & PICS. I get that the Oleg has perfect blacks, where the qled doesn’t. You've been lucky. I’m looking at the two, played a fair amount of Destiny 2, so your comment seals it for me. I'm watching Mandolorian and at night scenes the black are basically grey. As an owner of the CX, I can confidently recommend it. LG CX mitigate this problem kind of full loaded. II. Glad to help out! "MuVChat" was created by Rien Heald and he sat down with the Chicago Herald where he described this … Vertical banding (can be seen on very grey scenes). The Q90T seems like a much better TV for your uses. use the following search parameters to narrow your results: This subreddit is for news and discussion of OLED displays, OLED lighting, etc. Yeah I replaced it. Currently playing the Xbox one x on it and it’s amazing, especially the VRR and ALLM. To another big concern for many with OLED... burn-in. Anyways. Picture quality wise both these TVs are similar. I had the Sony A8H and returned it and got the Q90T. I was torn between the two but man 4k gaming looks amazing on the cx. I'm leaning a bit towards the Q90T. © 2021 reddit inc. All rights reserved. [–]playingwithfire 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago* (0 children). I replaced an old LCD so I probably wasn’t used to an ultra bright TV but the OLED doesn’t cause me any of the issues I anticipated. I run my C9 maxed out brightness for 18hr gaming sessions and have had 0 issues in the year I've owned it. LG hasn’t promised a date for Freesync support, so VRR might not work properly with the Xbox series x and the LG CX. And while i say i'll get a qled in 2 years, i may still end up buying oled because the tech could improve a lot by then. From everything I've read, the CX is supposed to be the better in PQ, due to the self-emissive technology. use the following search parameters to narrow your results: Check The F.A.Q. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. Yeah tough one, wish the CX came in a larger size for that price. Brightness wise, things are looking fine for the CX. I’m coming from a JS8500 and even though I wanted the 77 CX, I’m going to be 13 ft away and think the 85 Q80T may fit better. [–]metalfacemark 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (1 child). My CX is too bright for my tastes. [–]The96kHz 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (1 child), [–]wowelysiumthrowaway 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children), [–]Chris8920 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago* (0 children). [–]caedin8 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (3 children). Unsure what OLEDs are? [–]APSolidSnake 1 point2 points3 points 8 months ago (2 children), [–]Havoc2638 0 points1 point2 points 8 months ago (1 child), [–]APSolidSnake 0 points1 point2 points 8 months ago (0 children), Idk but it feels based on the reviews etc etc that the CX it's a "let's cut corners" type of oled, well that depends on the taste , if you like saturated images and not worrying about burn in (its a overstated issue) but nvm , go for QLED, [–]jdbills 2 points3 points4 points 8 months ago (0 children). But I tend to watch tv/game in a reasonably well lit room anyway so I’m not sure whether I’ll notice the difference all that much? [–]sex-cauldr0n 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (0 children), [–]UnholybuffaloLG CX 4 points5 points6 points 3 months ago (12 children). Yeah it definitely is overstated. I would go to a shop, where you could see the difference with your own eye. Exactly. [–]sfa7x 0 points1 point2 points 7 months ago (0 children), [–]Godpaul 0 points1 point2 points 6 months ago (0 children), I am also confused between these 2 but former is not available in India. Even if it isn't perfect in every shot, overall, it will definitely be better. Will wait for year end to grab it in a deal. Now, I've got my eye on either an LG CX or a Samsung Q90T (as mentioned). With Black Friday coming up soon I’m definitely going to be buying one or the other of these 2 TVs in the next few weeks, but which one? [–]NO-OXI 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children), This was my decision also, finally pulled the trigger on the CX, the OLED just makes everything look next gen compared to LCD, [–]ElectricalJigalo 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children), I have a 65" c9. I'm hoping this never comes to Canada... this is far worse than the red laser pen. Stuttering happens because OLEDs have an almost instant response time. [–]thecontentjones 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children), [–]Wardog555 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (2 children). My reason for not getting an LG Oled (even though I want one). You’re literally describing me with your post! Its amazing at night, but sucks during the day in my bright lit room. I’m concerned about screen burn being an issue, and I know it’s something that will always be in the back of my mind, but how much of a risk actually is it in real world use? But honestly, I barely notice a difference in the latency with game mode either on or off, so I might just forget about game mode in the first place. Don't leave the damn thing on a static image for a week straight and you'll be fine. Currently I get a hefty discount on the Q90T via work, so I can get the 55" for £1100. [–]Havoc2638 1 point2 points3 points 8 months ago (3 children). [–]wandererarkhamknight 1 point2 points3 points 8 months ago (0 children). I use a shield pro on my OLED and a roku ultra on my Samsung and both are great Both TVs will have each manufacturer's best processor so you should be fine. It’s gotten way better in recent years, to the point where most people won’t have to consider it when purchasing a new TV, however it can still be an issue for people who do heavy gaming. I personally enjoy the dark room CX experience more. Samsung TVs have really bad HDR performance in Game Mode. Is 77" too big for a mount that extends over the fireplace? Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. Burn-in isn't as much of a concern as people make it out to be. Also, I’m a worrier. If you sit down in a dark room in your couch and watch the revenant, you will get a better experience on an OLED than on an LCD based tv. Its actually pretty close and a lot of it is gonna depend on the kind of content he watches and the viewing conditions he watches it in. 2 or 3 hrs continuously ?? I do not gaming at all, and wouldn’t even think twice about getting an OLED for my use case. [–]shashank8293 0 points1 point2 points 8 months ago (0 children). I used a 55c6p for my pc gaming rig but it did end up with some burn in. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. That stops the tv from doing pixel refreshes while it's off (like it would in your home where it is plugged in but turned off). It does have local dimming, but its off in game mode. Glad to hear you like the picture. I bought in and was hesitant, so I called in and they said it does cover burn in, unless it’s caused by intentional hardware error. LG BX OLED: The LG BX OLED is similar to the LG CX OLED and cheaper, but it doesn't get as bright. Get an ad-free experience with special benefits, and directly support Reddit. If anything, by far the biggest problem with burn in is that people think it's a thing, so they worry about it. Driver touch nano. It’s essentially just a “ok, turn it on, does it have burn in, yep, do we have easy, cheap replacement parts to fix after 4 and a half years? I, too, did grill my Best Buy customer care desk in person about all possibly scenarios and was told that whether by user error or happenstance burn in would be covered. The kicker here is that BB doesn't care how the burn-in got there. Voltage Converters, Region Free Blu-ray DVD, Multi-System TV & 220 Volt Appliances. Now, unless I am missing something, features like these and more can be turned off on a per-input basis. As it happens, the LG CX is on discount right now at around £1300 for the 55", but I have seen a few drops a little below that. Honestly you can’t go wrong with either one. Some have mentioned the ABL and logo luminance settings. I agree with this, the 65CX was my first OLED tv and I came from a 5 year old Hisense LCD. The film maker or game makers original intent is completely missing. P. PNTR Member. No Deals, Spam, Self Promotion, or Referral Links/Link Shortening (This includes Amazon Smile). Read shit online or watch that idiot Quantum Apotheosis's videos on YouTube. [–]caedin8 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children). I’ll go against the grain and advise against the OLED...at least for your case. To me, the Samsung offerings these days are lovely TVs... but ultimately a spiritual successor of what has been the go-to workable method for a non-burn in risked 4k for quite some time. Thanks for commenting. The Q90T seems like a much better TV for your uses. But what you just described on The Revenant could really bother me. [–]shashank8293 1 point2 points3 points 8 months ago (1 child). The Q90T will beat it hands down. which would be better for watching sports via youtubetv/cable (the CX or the Q90)? No META [Suggestions] Posts, please message the moderators through Modmail Instead. Ok cool issue credit”. Now, granted, if you go in and say “yo, some person on Reddit told me to try to fuck up my tv so I can get a new one for free”... welp that may be pushing it... though according to my local BB they truly don’t give a damn. I've said this before, but the LG CX doesn't support HDR as it was intended by film and game makers. I’d pick my Q90 over my OLED. 400-500 hours of that and you are likely to start seeing burn-in IF you are looking for it. [–]UnholybuffaloLG CX 0 points1 point2 points 2 months ago (0 children). Reason why is because the CX and C9 have gamma issues. did a side by side comparison (youtube) that made the LG panel look better in game mode, though he did not test for black crush. Samsung j1 f firmware. I understand this is personal preference. That said, if you’re not concerned about burn-in, or just flat out don’t care, than get the OLED (provides you’re not going to be in a super bright room). If you can a lot though, then I suggest the CX as it’s the smoothest gaming tv / monitor I have ever played on. My c9 is hung op on my wall next to my window and during summer my tv is basically a window. The LG user interface is snappier and faster, and it feels premium in comparison with Samsung. Game motion plus is awesome and a great feature on the Q90T. I am sure they have excellent features in practice that very much make them a 2020, current gen TV, but they just don't feel that way to me. Moderators reserve the right to remove your post at our discretion. I don't like overly bright content to begin with since I watch a lot of TV and play games in the dark at night so I find overly bright screens actually cause me to have eye strain. (In 2 years apr). I think out of the box (pre-calibrated), in brighter conditions and if a lot of people are going to be using (which is sounds like neither of these will be an issue) I would go with the Samsung, Yet for the better picture quality the CX will always be a better pick though they've been hard to grab just in the last week or so. Here is a comparison video with a C9 and a Q90 next to eachother showing the pixels and also some scenes to compare, again both great tvs, different technologies. The samsung will get brighter overall... but the question is do you really need that... no, likely not. It's not even close. I don't mind the built in UI of LG but motion leave some to be desired on 24fps stuff and better upscaling of 1080p stuff might be nice, lots of 1080p movies on netflix. I have the CX, and my yellow powerbar from Destiny 2 is burned in. With burn in, I'm not too worried since I watch a variety of stuff and kids play a variety of different games, not the same one over and over. It will guarantee you a new TV in about five years for free at the same level as the CX that you buy tomorrow. I can't get a warranty against that in India. How often were you playing the game and did you enable any burn in features? As far as burn in if you watch enough varied content and you're not playing the same game for 10 hours a day for months its not anything to worry about. Probably the wrong place to ask, but I’m torn between the two TVs above (LG cx or Samsung q90t). Much happier with the Samsung. Deciding between three TV exchange options. VI. And there has been some ghosting when HDR is enabled on game mode, so I turn hdr off for game mode, or I play without game mode on when I’m not playing online. And I plan on using the TV for at least 6-7 years. I keep it on OLED light 50, 70 and 80 for SDR, HDR and DV. I have a dark room and watch tv mainly at night. I’m a pretty critical grader I suppose... but while the TV is in my opinion the best in its price range (and maybe the best given price of anything on the market for TVs), there is room for improvement in VRR, OLED safety, and the like. Even less can be found 8k content. Though i only game 8-10 hours a week, [–]marcinp123 0 points1 point2 points 4 months ago (0 children). Blindly copying someone else's settings is not calibrating a tv. The only problems I have with the LG are more minor. Rendered by PID 7670 on r2-app-0eb0a9694a6890bd1 at 2021-02-13 16:51:51.162735+00:00 running 2d21a00 country code: FR. I would go CX because I heard Samsung is game mode has terrible image quality due to the local dimming being disabled, so games will look much nicer on CX. I’ve been really enjoying it. If you like dark scenes and great contrast and punchy text with a snappy premium feeling UI go LG. The guy at the counter literally told me to do it. [–]MortgageReady2444 0 points1 point2 points 2 months ago (3 children). ABL is active all the time to any image displayed by the TV. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=226kWMOVGGc&t=404s, [–]eclap78 1 point2 points3 points 8 months ago (3 children). So not worrying about burn-in is a big deal for me. The oled has the better image quality IF you watch darker scenes and darker content like Star Wars, Avengers, MAtrix, Justice League, Men in Black, etc.. and video games. Panasonic 65GZ1000 4K HDR OLED TV, Epson TW-9400W PRO 4K UHD / 3D (6050UBe) Projector, LG SN11RG 7.1.4 Dolby Atmos / DTS-X Soundbar, Benq EW3270U 4K HDR monitor, Panasonic UB820 (Dolby Vision/HDR10+), Apple TV 4K, FireTV 4K Stick and Vero 4K+ OSMC 4K HDR / 3D Media Player. I like to watch some older stuff on Netflix (old star treks, that kind of thing), alongside newer stuff, is the cx decent for that type of low quality sdr tv watching? When requesting help for issues POST DETAILS, MODELS, & PICS. I think if you’re just watching movies and not CNN all day or games, I would probably get the LG myself. Sep 3, 2020 2 0 20. There was also a good comparison review here where a user looked at the Q90T and a new LG OLED and noticed more black crush on the OLED. It has that wow factor. 2,000 hrs on a C8 used mostly for HDR gaming... no burn-in. I’ve always had lcd/led TVs so dark room viewing has always given me eye strain, so I always watch tv and play games in a well lit room. A different kind of question about the LG CX. Honestly, once you go OLED, there is no way back. You are right, the QLED is probably a better gaming TV, while OLED is a better movie TV, not just for burn in risk, but also for brightness and true HDR experience. Take a pic of your screen with an all red background. If I like to watch a variety of movies and series, everything from Netflix to Amazon to movies from the 70s or from this year, and I use ab UHD Blu ray or streaming media player, is most of my content likely to be HD and thus affected by ABL, or not so much? I returned the Samsung because the blooming was more annoying than I expected and because it was straining my eyes. If you push your OLED Light to 100 in SDR mode, your SDR content will be very bright, but it will still have a narrow range if that makes sense. This also includes YouTube links allowed at Mod Discretion (Rtings & HDTVTEST are allowed). [–]jordanpinheiro 8 points9 points10 points 8 months ago (6 children). To download the firmware mts 4g race. Also, if it’s in your budget, take a look at the Samsung q900ts. I'll never buy a Samsung TV again until they make the switch over to OLED or some other upcoming better tech. But I don't care, the picture is so good. There's not too much HDR content to watch on daily basis. I like my picture brighter and with more pop. Here is this question yet again... he you not seen the hundreds of posts like this before? [–]MrJamerss 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (0 children). [–]KindOldRaven 0 points1 point2 points 8 months ago (0 children). Well, surprisingly, OLED tech has come along way, and burn in doesn't pose all that much of a threat so long as you don't play 500 hours of Fifa or watch 24 hour news for two weeks. This is more about the content than the TV tho, filmakers love wide dynamic range and want to be able to make you squint in the dark scenes then have to look away with a bright flash. [–]UnholybuffaloLG CX 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (4 children). We have a qled downstairs as our main living room tv at the moment (very brightly lit room with a ton of natural light so not suitable for older down there), but even with the curtains closed downstairs I really like the hdr brightness when gaming and the colour vibrancy that comes with it at high brightness levels, will I notice ABL a lot with the CX? The oled will look great in most conditions but it will look incredible in a dark room, especially playing darker content, and it supports Dolby Vision as well as HDR, HDR 10, etc.. Currently looking for a new tv also and I’ve been lurking here for a couple of weeks.. still none the wiser .. I’ll be watching closely, [–]Jaugusts 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children). It's just by far the superior technology compared to anything else. [–]ConanTheBarbituate 0 points1 point2 points 8 months ago (3 children). No. Why? How do you put LG CX 55' to Portrait Mode? [–]sfa7x 0 points1 point2 points 7 months ago (2 children). [–]jwmonteith 4 points5 points6 points 8 months ago (0 children). Both of them are great TVs for any usage, whether in SDR and HDR quality. [–]mag914LG C9 -1 points0 points1 point 3 months ago (0 children), [–]majkkali -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 months ago (0 children). Ultimately it's what you're trying to get out of your TV that should influence your decision. [–]Jgiles7427 0 points1 point2 points 2 months ago (0 children). [–]RepeatableProcess 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (7 children). [–]lumper4ever 1 point2 points3 points 8 months ago (0 children). Samsung vs LG TV: overview. [–]streetbikesammy 2 points3 points4 points 8 months ago (4 children). II. See I didn’t think I was until we got the q85r downstairs (it was a warranty replacement from an older Samsung). Just received the Xbox Series X today (early via Walmart pre-order). Maybe the OLED will be good for it after all. Screen burn has really become a non issue lately. Thank you, that is a very convincing response. The panel itself is supposed to last for quite literally many years. I know the PQ might be a little bit downgraded, but it's the peace of mind that I'm after. Edit: got a shield and...meh it's kind of marginal. If the TV is older than likely 2 or 3 years, they will straight up give you store credit equal to the value you bought the TV at (its original new price) so you can replace it with a new set. LG OLED CX vs Samsung Q90T: sound quality (Image credit: LG / The Boys, Amazon Prime) Samsung has taken a big step forward this year in terms of sound. I compare CX with Sony A8H which is good and has better upscaling chip bit lacking in features. So, if you watch The Revenant, the OLED will perform relatively worse than an LCD (which QLED is a variety of) in daylight scenes in snow covered landscapes (which are very bright) because it will have to limit the peak brightness. The LG CX OLED TV stands out among the TVs of 2020 thanks to the stunning picture offered by its OLED panel, impressive sound and a great collection of smart features. It doesn't strain my eyes at all. [–]shashank8293 11 points12 points13 points 8 months ago (6 children). and join one of thousands of communities. QLED will be my go to until the micro-LED become affordable. I’ve heard several anecdotes about this too, though I’m always hesitant to go on them alone. Since you're planning on getting a 5 year warranty, which I'm assuming will cover burn-in risk for your OLED, that should be a non-issue for you. HD or SD doesn't matter, that is only the resolution. This means that even in SDR you can get this effect. which includes Buying Guides Search should be used as your query has probably come up before. Messaging Mods via their private inbox not via mod mail will result in a ban and your messages ignored. [–]babunal 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (6 children). In fact I turned my CX OLED brightness level down to 75 and it is still plenty bright for my needs even during the day. The Q90T wins in burn in risk, total brightness, and a true HDR. As far as picture goes, the q80t is amazing, especially comparing it the the 2017 Samsung 6 series it replaced in my room. Worst part is when the TV leaves the showroom anything happens to screen LG is not responsible. I have a q90t and the c9 and I find that the q90t has higher brightness and more inpactful hdr. Even on HDR and DV I still find it too bright but I know it needs to be bright to enjoy the picture improvements. Burn-in is a very much a per-pattern thing. Driver renesas electronics usb 3 0. If you play games I personally think Samsung is a better TV. That and stuttering issues and the "treat with immense care" aspect of OLEDs give me pause. (hdmi 2.1), granted this the VRR is buggy at the moment, but still, [–]spekkio4321 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (0 children). Please hire a professional OR utilize these resources for a DIY solution HCFR or AVS HD 709. And if you think the blooming doesn't look so bad in the showroom, wait until you see it in gaming mode. [–]barca0608 5 points6 points7 points 8 months ago (2 children). They can be removed at our discretion for any reason including but not limited to Off Topic posting & Misinformation. That isn't a thing for normal users, so please don't base your decision on that. QLED it is. I mainly do gaming and movie watching on my Samsung, both have benefits and drawbacks, it’s quite jarring going from the oled to the qled for stuff with dark content and the LG screen certainly looks better. The two best deals I could find is a Samsung 55 inch y q90t 4k tv at 1350$ CAD OR an LG CX 55 inch oled 4k tv at 1840$ CAD I hear that one of the downsides of the q90t is it doesn't support Dolby vision. WTF? But the most annoying thing about my c9 is that i have bright white edges around my c9. The best picture you can get all things considered will be an OLED in a dark room, but an OLED will suffer more from non ideal lightning. I know it's a rare case, but I like to be care-free when using my TV, and just the concern over using it and knowing that burn is a possibility would probably drive me nuts. Few do, actually. So.... idk why some people say it makes it look terrible. The issue with Samsung TVs is they need to disable a bunch of features in game mode that make them great TVs for movies. the samsung's color lacks sometimes while watching live sports compared to the LG, but the LG often doesn't look as sharp to me when the broadcast uses the main overhead field/court camera view. It worse in HDR too - HDR is the dumbest concept ever. QLED for gaming. I ended up getting the q80t for the next gen consoles and I couldn’t be any happier. Price is about the same for better picture, i recommend the C9 i come from a QLED 2018 amazing contrast vivid colors but the c9 its on another league ....if the c9 isnt available because everyone its looking for one ,go for the CX, [–]vicwynn 0 points1 point2 points 8 months ago (0 children).